Armstrong - Now I just want to put out there that for me, the focal point of my youth while watching the Tour de France was Armstrong. Regardless of the allegations bought against him, I will always accredit him with keeping me hooked into the sport, as will many other people of my generation. I think it is also important to separate the doping allegations from his work that he's done for cancer awareness and prevention. This week I have seen numerous "hashtags" on Twitter and words in the press from journalists I respect playing on the name of his foundation: Livestrong. These include "LieStrong" "LiveWrong" etc. The man may be a cheat/liar whatever, but to tar his foundation which has actually helped to save people's lives with the same brush is nonsensical and unjust.
Back to the story at hand then. For Armstrong to say that he wasn't going to contend the charges was an admission of guilt in it's own right. Though he never failed a drugs test (without being able to back it up with a doctor's prescription) during his career, doping allegations followed Armstrong around like a bad smell. So when the USADA (the US anti-doping agency) bought the charges against him earlier this year, it seemed that they'd finally "got their man". But I think this is the whole problem with the case.
I'm not going to use this forum to say that I don't think Armstrong is guilty or use it to throw out a wanton or controversial opinion. But I do think, and will say, that the way the USADA went about their findings into Armstrong are backhanded and unjustifiable. Much like the US Postal Team that they dubbed "ran the most sophisticated, professionalized and successful doping program sport has seen", they have come undone by their own flaws.
First of all, I want to take this away from cycling, and bring it to athletics. Justin Gatlin, American 100m sprinter, and bronze medal winner at the London 2012 Olympic games, has failed not one, but two drugs tests during his lengthy career, and as a result been banned twice. First in 2001 for two years for testing positive for amphetamines. Secondly in 2006 due to a positive test for "testosterone or its precursor". After both cases, he point blank denied the allegations, and looked for ways to blame anyone but himself. Instead of receiving a life-time ban for his second doping offence, he initially was served an eight year ban, which eventually was halved in 2007 to just four years. A small price to pay if you ask me for a man that knows the rules, yet broke them multiple times and then looked for scapegoats when he was caught ashen-faced and red-handed. The amount of leniency the USADA showed to Gatlin was remarkable and incredulous. It's no wonder that to this day, many American athletes are still knowingly pumping themselves full of illegal drugs to enhance their abilities. Some of you reading this might go now then "Ah, but Armstrong has received a life-time ban, surely that's the USADA learning from their mistakes and making their punishments more severe". Yes, Armstrong has been banned for life. But let's look at the other dopers mentioned in the case that all come under the USADA's jurisdiction:
Floyd Landis - Winner of the Tour de France in 2006, subsequently stripped of title after posting an "abnormally high rate of testosterone" in a urine sample after Stage 17 of that Tour. Banned for two years from 2007, but denied all charges until 2010, when he admitted to cheating, and stated that other members of USPS, including Armstrong, continually doped. No further action has been bought against Landis to date.
Tom Danielson, Levi Leipheimer, George Hincapie, Christian Vandevelde and David Zabriskie- All banned for 6 months from September 2012 for admitting to doping while on the USPS team, again saying that Armstrong doped while there.
So the differences are then that if you dope, but tell on someone else for doing the exact same thing as you, you will receive a far less severe punishment, even if you tried to feebly maintain your innocence for years before hand, then suddenly had a change of heart... Makes perfect sense right? Phil Liggett, ITV's long-term Tour commentator, though daft is his fierce maintenance that Armstrong didn't dope, has somewhat of a point when he accused the USADA of putting Armstrong on a "pedestal high above all the other riders". Not only this, but again it shows that the USADA is far too lenient when it comes to handing out suspensions for doping. It should be black and white, so much so that I'm going to give what I'm about to say a whole line to itself:
If you dope, regardless of the circumstances, and you get caught, you should be banned from your profession for life.
Armstrong deserves his suspension, and all the abuse that he is getting from all corners of the world for lying and deceiving his way to multiple Tour wins. But so do the rest of the riders who dope/have doped. One man that is not a rider, but deserves all the fury that is directed his way is the recently departed Team RadioShack-Nissan boss Johan Bruyneel, who cowardly didn't show up at the 2012 Tour due to the forthcoming allegations. He was the mastermind behind the doping program at not only USPS, but later the Discovery Channel team. If Bruyneel is not convicted for his involvement, then the sport will be in an even greater state of disarray than it is now.
So to sum up then. Armstrong is a cheat, yes. The lifetime ban imposed on him as well the stripping of all his race results is a just punishment for his years of deceit. But the USADA have let slip a chance to really solve the doping cloud that hangs over cycling by not taking harsher action on those riders who have not only been caught cheating, but also admitting their guilt. The fact that the report also called those riders "courageous" is an insult to all the riders who are clean, and have never needed EPO to make it to the top of their profession. Lets just hope they don't put their feet in it even more by giving Armstrong's wins away to other riders who have been caught cheating as well (Ivan Basso, Jan Ullrich etc). This was a chance for a real corner to be turned in the history of pro-cycling. However, I fear that incompetence by the anti-doping bodies has ruined the real chance for all sports, not just cycling, to be drug-free.
Baltimore Ravens defensive woes continue - So this was the big news for me of the weekend. Though the Ravens are 5-1, and top of their division, the performances of late have left a lot of people, me included, cause for concern. Now the latest turn of events could really determine what kind of team the Ravens are. Coming off the back of a lucky (according to Joe Flacco) win against the Dallas Cowboys on Sunday was the news that the main man in the middle of defense Ray Lewis is out for the season with a torn tricep. On top of this was the almost as bad news that in the same game, starting cornerback Ladarius Webb is also out for the season with a torn ACL.
Now in terms of form, Webb's injury on paper looks to be the biggest concern for the Ravens. Already this year, he had achieved one forced-fumble, one interception and 25 tackles. With questions raised over second stater Cary Williams and whether or not he would be replaced by first-round pick from 2011 Jimmy Smith, suddenly they're both going have to step up their game. Williams responded after a mauling against the New England Patriots with a pick-six against the the Cleveland Browns, but he will have to improve his consistency with Webb now gone. Smith on the other hand has not quite seen his draft potential flourish yet, having seen the third-round pick from 2009 Webb keep him out. This is his chance though to stake a starter spot in the future with the Ravens still seemingly headed for the play-offs at least. Third choice now is going to be Corey Graham, who was signed from the Chicago Bears in March after a Pro-Bowl season last year. This again provides him with an ample opportunity to see more defensive game time, as well as trying to push for a regular starting spot next year.
As well all know, games aren't played on paper, and for me, the biggest concern is seeing THE best middle linebacker in the history of the game Ray Lewis gone. After 17 years, you have to wonder if this could have been his swan-song, and whether or not he will return. When he was drafted in 1996, he didn't just become a member of the Ravens, he became the Ravens. He embodies everything that the team try and fight for, and is the emotional leader on defense. Though this year it seemed that father-time might have been catching up with the veteran, having seen him lose weight over the off-season and in turn not having the same devastating power he has had, it is still no question that his loss is about as bad as it could have got for the Ravens. Dannell Ellerbe and Brendon Ayenbadejo will now fight it out between them to fill Lewis' big boots, but it might be a job that both of them combined won't be able to do. Though there is no doubt that Lewis will be there pumping up the team for game-day, his presence on the field will be sorely missed. One has to wonder if it is the end of an era for the Ravens, but as the great man himself will tell you, he'll never say never.
Next week should bring about the return of the more normal format of my blog, so until then, I hope you all enjoyed reading, and thanks for your continued support.